چکیده
Chain-of-Thought (CoT) generation has substantially improved the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) on complex reasoning tasks, including code generation, data analysis, and exam-style question answering. Despite these advances, purely neural LLMs continue to struggle with elementary logical reasoning problems and lack the determinism, soundness, and reliability characteristic of symbolic reasoning systems. Conversely, classical symbolic methods such as SAT solving and exact cover guarantee correctness and completeness, but require problems to be expressed in highly specialized formal encodings, limiting their applicability to natural language inputs. In this work, we present a synergistic neuro-symbolic framework that bridges this gap by combining neural semantic parsing with deterministic exact cover reasoning. Given a Zebra-style logic puzzle in natural language, an LLM translates entities and constraints into structured tool calls that construct an exact cover instance. A symbolic solver then computes the solution and provides feedback to iteratively refine invalid, under- or overconstrained encodings, exploiting the uniqueness property of Zebra puzzles. We conduct a comprehensive empirical evaluation across multiple parameter scales, post-training paradigms, and LLM families. The results demonstrate that our hybrid approach consistently outperforms strong plain neural baselines, including CoT prompting, as well as recent neuro-symbolic methods.
متن کامل
Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence arXiv:2611.03641v1 (cs) [Submitted on 2 Nov 2026] Title:From Natural Language to Exact Cover: A Neuro-Symbolic Approach to Zebra Puzzles Authors:Paulius Skaisgiris, Thomas Pammer, Veronika Semmelrock, Mykyta Ielanskyi, Maximilian Heisinger, Erich Kobler View a PDF of the paper titled From Natural Language to Exact Cover: A Neuro-Symbolic Approach to Zebra Puzzles, by Paulius Skaisgiris and 5 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Chain-of-Thought (CoT) generation has substantially improved the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) on complex reasoning tasks, including code generation, data analysis, and exam-style question answering. Despite these advances, purely neural LLMs continue to struggle with elementary logical reasoning problems and lack the determinism, soundness, and reliability characteristic of symbolic reasoning systems. Conversely, classical symbolic methods such as SAT solving and exact cover guarantee correctness and completeness, but require problems to be expressed in highly specialized formal encodings, limiting their applicability to natural language inputs. In this work, we present a synergistic neuro-symbolic framework that bridges this gap by combining neural semantic parsing with deterministic exact cover reasoning. Given a Zebra-style logic puzzle in natural language, an LLM translates entities and constraints into structured tool calls that construct an exact cover instance. A symbolic solver then computes the solution and provides feedback to iteratively refine invalid, under- or overconstrained encodings, exploiting the uniqueness property of Zebra puzzles. We conduct a comprehensive empirical evaluation across multiple parameter scales, post-training paradigms, and LLM families. The results demonstrate that our hybrid approach consistently outperforms strong plain neural baselines, including CoT prompting, as well as recent neuro-symbolic methods. Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2611.03641 [cs.AI] (or arXiv:2611.03641v1 [cs.AI] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2611.03641 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Paulius Skaisgiris [view email] [v1] Mon, 2 Nov 2026 18:58:21 UTC (129 KB) Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)